HOODx Premium Reverses to 40bps as Liquidity Stabilizes Near $473K
The Robinhood xStock flipped from a -28bps discount to a +40bps premium over 11.5 hours, with liquidity holding steady and price sources diverging 77bps.
Summary
HOODx, the tokenized Robinhood equity derivative, shifted from trading at a discount to the underlying HOOD equity to a modest premium. Over the 11.5-hour baseline period, the premium_bps swung from -173.97bps to +40.06bps, with the most recent observation showing token_price_usd at $99.95885790527124 versus reference_price_usd of $99.56. Liquidity_usd of $473,248.42999999993 has remained stable across 18 pools, though volume_24h_usd of $39,358.14 implies thin velocity at 0.08x liquidity turnover. The concentration risk persists with top5_holder_share at 0.9429403909534159. A 77bps price gap between Jupiter and top-pool execution creates execution uncertainty.
Why it matters
Premium dynamics in tokenized equities signal market sentiment and arbitrage efficiency; the reversal from discount to premium, combined with stable liquidity but thin volume, indicates potential repositioning rather than sustained demand.
Key observations
HOODx trades at +40.1bps versus the HOOD reference price.
premium_bps = 40.1 bps (baseline -28.324)
Circulating supply is 597,392.604 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).
supply_ui_amount = 597,392.604 tokens (baseline 597,392.604)
Tracked DEX liquidity totals $473,248 across 18 pools.
liquidity_usd = 473,248 USD (baseline 462,457)
The five largest token accounts hold 94.3% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).
top5_account_share = 0.943 ratio (baseline 0.943)
24h DEX volume of $39,358 implies 0.08x turnover of pooled liquidity.
volume_24h_usd = 39,358 USD
Thesis
HOODx has transitioned from persistent discounting to modest premium pricing, suggesting reduced selling pressure or improved bid-side interest, though price source fragmentation and concentrated supply warrant caution.
Claims
- Factconfidence 95%
HOODx trades at a premium_bps of 40.062063606995025 to the underlying HOOD equity reference price, reversing from a baseline average discount of approximately -28.32446192733453 bps.
Would falsify this: reference_price_usd stale or incorrect premium_bps calculation error
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The 24-hour price_change_24h_pct of 5.162864058196431 in HOODx outpaced the underlying equity movement, compressing the prior discount.
Would falsify this: underlying equity moved more than reported price_change_24h_pct sampled at different interval
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
Liquidity_usd of $473,248.42999999993 across pair_count of 18 pools has remained within a narrow $22K band ($452K-$475K) over the baseline period, indicating sticky market maker commitment.
Would falsify this: liquidity composition changed materially between snapshots single pool dominance masked aggregate stability
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The top5_holder_share of 0.9429403909534159 implies concentrated supply with limited free float, amplifying price impact from modest flow shifts.
Would falsify this: top 5 holders include custodial accounts representing many beneficial owners holder composition changed significantly in last hour
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The 77bps gap between token_price_usd ($99.95885790527124) and dex_price_usd ($99.19) reflects execution venue fragmentation, with Jupiter quoting tighter than on-chain pools.
Would falsify this: dex_price_usd drawn from illiquid pool Jupiter quote stale or simulated
- Calculationconfidence 80%
Volume_24h_usd of $39,358.14 against liquidity_usd of $473,248.42999999993 yields 0.083x daily turnover, suggesting the premium shift was not driven by high-conviction flow but rather by order book repositioning.
Would falsify this: volume_24h_usd undercounted due to API gaps liquidity_usd overstated by uncommitted depth
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
Txns_h1 of 6 versus txns_24h of 2598 indicates sharply declining intraday activity, with the premium emerging during a low-volume regime that may lack validating follow-through.
Would falsify this: txns_h1 timing misaligned with hour boundary batch transactions undercounted in txns_h1
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The premium compression from -173.97bps to +40.06bps over 11.5 hours may reflect closing of short positions or arbitrage convergence rather than directional bullish positioning, given the thin volume context.
Would falsify this: on-chain borrow rates show no short covering underlying equity moved >5% creating mechanical premium
Evidence ledger
4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.
- onchainreliability: primary
HOODx token supply at slot 439117845(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:65af8d75c2fdeeaa82648e4ba2611e9be34324b7c78b57cb8e66e6b66c0fc267
- onchainreliability: primary
HOODx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:1a69c9f794291a85966cec0db58651082e05d273d67a04e7259a6279068d10da
- marketreliability: high
HOODx DEX pools, liquidity, and volume(DexScreener aggregated venue data)
sha256:4ae3747535ebde7c4ea0c58987cbc78ea94a829aa160915460adcbde475eabc6
- marketreliability: high
HOODx token price and HOOD reference price(Jupiter price service)
sha256:81504346969f5dc4784b22cba5852077f1041ad77565780b9bd8144d1bdcad97
Methodology
Methods
- Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
- Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
- Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
- Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines
Exclusions and transformations
- UTC clock normalization
- Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
- Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed
Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset
Confidence rationale
Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.62 (moderate).
Limitations
- Baseline liquidity data has gaps (9 of 24 snapshots null) limiting trend certainty
- txns_h1 and txns_24h lack timestamp precision for intraday pattern validation
- Top 5 holder identities unknown—could include protocol treasuries or multi-user custody
- Price source conflict resolution methodology not specified
- No on-chain borrow/lending data to validate short-interest hypothesis
- Reference price provenance and update frequency unclear for a 24/5 equity
- Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
Related research
This object elsewhere
sha256:05b213feb855863405328303595837283e202ac5323ecadf695f927522c4b95b
This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.
Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.