Skip to content
METIS
Menu
Marketmetis_0101KZYX6XH3S6CQHD4Bv1

SPCXx Trades at 55bps Discount with 5.6x Liquidity Turnover

Tokenized SpaceX equity shows notable price divergence and high velocity relative to shallow on-chain liquidity

Confidence: moderate62%SPCXx

Summary

SPCXx trades at a 55.1 basis point discount to its $142.00 reference price, with $4.59M in 24h volume representing 5.65x turnover of the $812.7k liquidity pool. Top 5 holders control 85.2% of the 559,998 token supply.

Why it matters

High velocity relative to liquidity suggests price sensitivity to order flow, while holder concentration and premium volatility raise questions about market structure efficiency.

Key observations

SPCXx trades at -55.1bps versus the SPCX reference price.

premium_bps = -55.1 bps (baseline -8.025)

Circulating supply is 559,998.473 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).

supply_ui_amount = 559,998.473 tokens (baseline 559,998.473)

Tracked DEX liquidity totals $812,701 across ? pools.

liquidity_usd = 812,701 USD (baseline 813,982)

The five largest token accounts hold 85.2% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).

top5_account_share = 0.852 ratio (baseline 0.852)

24h DEX volume of $4,594,640 implies 5.65x turnover of pooled liquidity.

volume_24h_usd = 4,594,640 USD

Thesis

The significant discount and high turnover ratio indicate potential liquidity constraints or market sentiment divergence from the underlying reference asset.

Claims

  • Calculationconfidence 95%

    Current premium of -55.1bps represents a 47.1bps widening from the 11.5-hour baseline average of -8.0bps

  • Calculationconfidence 100%

    24h volume of $4.59M is 5.65x current liquidity of $812.7k

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Top 5 holders control 85.2% of circulating supply

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Token price declined 3.32% over 24 hours

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Supply remains stable at 559,998.47 tokens

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    Discount persists despite $4.59M in daily volume, suggesting structural rather than temporary factors

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    High holder concentration may amplify price impact of large trades

    Would falsify this: If top holders are passive liquidity pools If concentration metric includes protocol contracts

Evidence ledger

4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.

Methodology

Methods

  • Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
  • Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
  • Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
  • Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines

Exclusions and transformations

  • UTC clock normalization
  • Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
  • Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed

Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset

Confidence rationale

Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.62 (moderate).

Limitations

  • DEX price feed unavailable (dex_price_usd: null)
  • Transaction count data missing (txns_h1, txns_24h: null)
  • Dexscreener source failed (HTTP 429)
  • 11.5-hour baseline may not capture full market cycles
  • High holder concentration includes pool addresses
  • Pair count data unavailable
  • Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
  • Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/Xs3oZwbHvqis4NYcf4YKWmEia2eC84wSiVrcYcTqpH8.

Related research

This object elsewhere

sha256:31e209a06fb966e86e306da05475bd2ab964177493dcf10d3642f2dbd2025e4a

This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.

Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.