HOODx Discount Widens to 224bps as Liquidity Thins
Tokenized Robinhood equity trades at record discount with 94% supply held by top five wallets, raising execution risk concerns.
Summary
HOODx trades at -223.94bps to HOOD reference price, a material deviation from its 10.8-hour baseline range. With 94.36% supply concentration and only 0.27x liquidity turnover, the $333,963 DEX pool shows signs of stress. Supply remains stable at 597,393 tokens while 24h volume of $91,748 suggests limited trading depth.
Why it matters
High supply concentration combined with wide premiums increases execution risk for traders and may signal underlying market structure issues in tokenized equity markets.
Key observations
HOODx trades at -223.9bps versus the HOOD reference price.
premium_bps = -223.9 bps (baseline -6.79)
Circulating supply is 597,392.618 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).
supply_ui_amount = 597,392.618 tokens (baseline 597,392.618)
Tracked DEX liquidity totals $333,963 across ? pools.
liquidity_usd = 333,963 USD (baseline 333,963)
The five largest token accounts hold 94.4% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).
top5_account_share = 0.944 ratio (baseline 0.944)
24h DEX volume of $91,748 implies 0.27x turnover of pooled liquidity.
volume_24h_usd = 91,748 USD
Thesis
The extreme discount and concentrated ownership create a fragile liquidity environment where large holders' actions could amplify price dislocations.
Claims
- Factconfidence 100%
HOODx trades at a discount of 223.94 basis points to the HOOD reference price of $95.014.
- Factconfidence 100%
Circulating supply is 597,392.618 tokens, unchanged throughout the 10.8-hour baseline period.
- Calculationconfidence 100%
DEX liquidity totals $333,963 with 24-hour volume of $91,748, implying 0.27x liquidity turnover.
- Factconfidence 100%
The five largest token accounts hold 94.36% of supply, indicating extreme holder concentration.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The current -223.94 bps premium represents a material deviation from the baseline range of +72.33 to -63.41 bps, suggesting a structural shift rather than normal volatility.
Would falsify this: Subsequent premiums revert to baseline range within 24 hours Reference price data feed error identified
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The extreme discount may reflect liquidity stress or forced selling by large holders given the 94.36% supply concentration.
Would falsify this: Large holder wallets show no outflows Alternative fundamental catalyst identified DEX liquidity increases substantially
- Calculationconfidence 100%
The token price of $92.886 is $2.128 below the reference price, consistent with the -223.94 bps discount.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The 0.27x liquidity turnover ratio suggests limited trading activity relative to pool size, potentially exacerbating price impact during large trades.
Would falsify this: Turnover ratio increases above 1.0x in subsequent periods Volume data excludes major off-chain settlements
Evidence ledger
4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.
- onchainreliability: primary
HOODx token supply at slot 438949527(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:5578b31200df2daea8ee08e1b73fff263de87a17766a2d5af83f2d69955c0645
- onchainreliability: primary
HOODx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:795ed18e87f23632af7510935fa6d4987abf644b3e213c9022ebe5be95165979
- marketreliability: high
HOODx token price and HOOD reference price(Jupiter price service)
sha256:39c19b1e48df4c6edc011349dcb8739ec282a35e748e96e9a405aa02a4b72e0d
- marketreliability: medium
HOODx pooled liquidity and 24h volume (DexScreener unavailable)(Jupiter price service)
sha256:5c2c979f6366aa5d95dbcedd55efac180c93c8c2a34aed9501153bbd941acbc0
Methodology
Methods
- Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
- Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
- Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
- Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines
Exclusions and transformations
- UTC clock normalization
- Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
- Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed
Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset
Confidence rationale
Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.6 (moderate).
Limitations
- DEX data incomplete: dex_price_usd and pair_count unavailable due to HTTP 429 errors
- Transaction counts (txns_h1, txns_24h) not captured in current snapshot
- Baseline liquidity data sparse: only 2 of 23 snapshots contain liquidity_usd
- Top5 holder share includes pool and custodial accounts, may overstate true concentration
- Reference price feed source and update frequency not disclosed
- 24h volume may include wash trading not filtered by source
- Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
- Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/XsvNBAYkrDRNhA7wPHQfX3ZUXZyZLdnCQDfHZ56bzpg.
Related research
This object elsewhere
sha256:c4e14e6ba8de804d1abfe6471a5e64ec4fc95f2cf949dc33a2df32abc3cdcbcc
This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.
Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.