NVDAx Premium Widens to 16.9bps as Supply Concentration Reaches 69.7%
Tokenized NVIDIA exposure shows elevated premium and stable liquidity turnover amid concentrated holdings
Summary
NVDAx trades at a 16.9 basis point premium to NVDA with $2.0M liquidity, $1.27M daily volume, and 69.7% supply held by top five accounts, indicating moderate activity but potential concentration risk.
Why it matters
Understanding premium dynamics and holder concentration is critical for assessing execution costs and market integrity in tokenized equity exposures.
Key observations
NVDAx trades at +16.9bps versus the NVDA reference price.
premium_bps = 16.9 bps (baseline -3.015)
Circulating supply is 321,577.794 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).
supply_ui_amount = 321,577.794 tokens (baseline 321,577.794)
Tracked DEX liquidity totals $2,002,710 across ? pools.
liquidity_usd = 2,002,710 USD (baseline 2,002,710)
The five largest token accounts hold 69.7% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).
top5_account_share = 0.697 ratio (baseline 0.697)
24h DEX volume of $1,272,092 implies 0.64x turnover of pooled liquidity.
volume_24h_usd = 1,272,092 USD
Thesis
The persistent premium and high holder concentration suggest limited arbitrage efficiency in the NVDAx market, creating potential mispricing risk for professional traders.
Claims
- Factconfidence 100%
NVDAx trades at a premium of 16.9 basis points to the NVDA reference price of $223.77, with a token price of $224.15.
- Calculationconfidence 95%
The token's 24-hour price change of 2.80% implies a price increase from approximately $217.99 to the current $224.15.
- Factconfidence 100%
Circulating supply is 321,577.794 tokens, having decreased by less than 0.00005% over the 11.3-hour baseline period.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The current premium of 16.9 bps sits in the upper quintile of the baseline range (-49.7 to +20.4 bps), indicating elevated relative pricing compared to the prior 11.3 hours.
- Calculationconfidence 95%
Top five holders control 69.7% of supply, up from 69.5% at the baseline start, representing an 18 basis point increase in concentration.
- Calculationconfidence 90%
The 24-hour volume of $1.27M against $2.00M in DEX liquidity yields a 0.64x turnover ratio, suggesting moderate trading intensity relative to available depth.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The combination of elevated premium, increasing holder concentration, and moderate turnover may signal constrained arbitrage capacity rather than organic price discovery.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
If the premium persists above 15 bps while holder concentration remains above 69%, the market may be experiencing structural inefficiencies rather than temporary dislocations.
Would falsify this: Premium dropping below 5 bps within 6 hours Holder concentration decreasing below 68% Liquidity increasing above $3M with unchanged volume
Evidence ledger
4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.
- onchainreliability: primary
NVDAx token supply at slot 438952405(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:87b211d0053b912a71527c21ca85241d13a5bd7ae26c997197b5c9638faf2318
- onchainreliability: primary
NVDAx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:a37bd814164731044aed6e0cf32419c3896ec5d8157aa7691a0702a45a9937ee
- marketreliability: high
NVDAx token price and NVDA reference price(Jupiter price service)
sha256:753bc00d13df20dbc3120fc106f2142332572a9d4c81cbbf0df9fb6782a6e49b
- marketreliability: medium
NVDAx pooled liquidity and 24h volume (DexScreener unavailable)(Jupiter price service)
sha256:8da62065c1d00877c68a4e062fa2869740b153f8019227608a8ab3cfe18057cc
Methodology
Methods
- Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
- Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
- Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
- Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines
Exclusions and transformations
- UTC clock normalization
- Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
- Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed
Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset
Confidence rationale
Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.6 (moderate).
Limitations
- DEX price data is unavailable due to API rate limiting, preventing direct on-chain premium verification.
- Transaction count metrics (txns_h1, txns_24h) are not reported, limiting assessment of trading frequency and market breadth.
- Liquidity data is only available for the current snapshot, preventing trend analysis of market depth over time.
- Top holder metric includes pool and custodial accounts, potentially overstating true ownership concentration.
- 24-hour volume lacks historical context within the baseline period, constraining turnover trend analysis.
- Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
- Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/Xsc9qvGR1efVDFGLrVsmkzv3qi45LTBjeUKSPmx9qEh.
Related research
This object elsewhere
sha256:1fbe59a63bec96a22be55c77865a08a692e28af149abd99babc58bf833c4596a
This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.
Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.