Skip to content
METIS
Menu
Marketmetis_0101KZYEY4CQ20DMF1SAv1

HOODx Trades at 32bps Discount with 94% Supply Concentration

Tokenized equity derivative shows volatile premium dynamics and high holder concentration over 11.5-hour observation period

Confidence: moderate60%HOODx

Summary

HOODx trades at -32.1 basis points to Robinhood reference price, with 94.3% of supply held by top five accounts. $360,757 in DEX liquidity supported $86,911 in 24-hour volume, representing 0.24x turnover. Premium volatility ranged from -270bps to +122bps across the 11.5-hour baseline period.

Why it matters

High holder concentration creates structural liquidity risk, while volatile premiums indicate potential mispricing or market-making constraints that could affect execution quality for size.

Key observations

HOODx trades at -32.1bps versus the HOOD reference price.

premium_bps = -32.1 bps (baseline -31.181)

Circulating supply is 597,392.604 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).

supply_ui_amount = 597,392.604 tokens (baseline 597,392.604)

Tracked DEX liquidity totals $360,757 across ? pools.

liquidity_usd = 360,757 USD (baseline 351,276)

The five largest token accounts hold 94.3% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).

top5_account_share = 0.943 ratio (baseline 0.943)

24h DEX volume of $86,911 implies 0.24x turnover of pooled liquidity.

volume_24h_usd = 86,911 USD

Thesis

HOODx exhibits persistent discount pricing relative to its equity reference, coupled with extreme supply concentration that may amplify price impact and premium volatility.

Claims

  • Factconfidence 100%

    HOODx trades at a discount of 32.09 basis points to the Robinhood reference price of $99.50, with a token price of $99.18.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Circulating supply is 597,392.60441429 tokens.

  • Calculationconfidence 100%

    24-hour DEX volume of $86,912 against $360,757 in pooled liquidity implies a 0.24x turnover ratio.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    The five largest token accounts control 94.29% of circulating supply, indicating extreme holder concentration.

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    Premium volatility has been significant over the 11.5-hour baseline, ranging from -269.9bps to +122.0bps, with the current -32.1bps reading near the median of the distribution.

    Would falsify this: If baseline snapshots contain fewer than 20 valid premium observations If extreme values represent data errors rather than traded prices

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The token price increased 4.31% over the past 24 hours despite trading at a discount to reference, suggesting the reference equity appreciated faster than the token price.

    Would falsify this: If reference price updates are asynchronous with token price discovery If the 24h change calculation uses a different baseline than premium calculation

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    Extreme supply concentration combined with moderate liquidity turnover may amplify price impact and contribute to premium volatility.

    Would falsify this: If concentrated holders are passive liquidity providers rather than active traders If top holder addresses include exchange cold wallets that do not affect circulating liquidity

Evidence ledger

4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.

Methodology

Methods

  • Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
  • Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
  • Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
  • Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines

Exclusions and transformations

  • UTC clock normalization
  • Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
  • Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed

Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset

Confidence rationale

Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.6 (moderate).

Limitations

  • DEX price data unavailable (dex_price_usd: null) limits cross-verification of token_price_usd
  • Transaction count metrics (txns_h1, txns_24h) and pair_count are not provided, constraining activity analysis
  • Single liquidity source (jupiter) after dexscreener failure creates potential for incomplete market picture
  • Top5 holder share includes pool and custodial accounts, which may overstate true concentration risk
  • 24-hour volume snapshot may not capture intraday liquidity dynamics visible in hourly metrics
  • Premium calculation methodology relative to reference price is not explicitly defined
  • Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
  • Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/XsvNBAYkrDRNhA7wPHQfX3ZUXZyZLdnCQDfHZ56bzpg.

Related research

This object elsewhere

sha256:67f4fe4244a4ca494bb4411c38290f902aabc5b66aa0e47ca99a203c179ae686

This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.

Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.