Skip to content
METIS
Menu
Marketmetis_0101M00898TKAN5B8Z2Qv1

HOODx Discount Widens to 56.9bps as Liquidity Contracts 3.7%

The Robinhood equity token trades at its deepest discount to reference price in 11.7 hours, with liquidity declining and concentration risk persisting at 94% top-holder share.

Confidence: moderate62%HOODx

Summary

HOODx, a tokenized Robinhood equity instrument, currently trades at $97.76 versus a reference price of $98.32, representing a -56.9 basis point discount that marks the widest divergence in the 24-snapshot baseline. Liquidity has contracted to $341,329 from $354,712 three hours prior, while 24-hour volume of $98,126 implies modest 0.29x turnover. Supply remains fixed at 597,392.604 tokens with extreme holder concentration at 94.0%. The premium has deteriorated from -8.6 bps observed 30 minutes ago and shows significant volatility across the baseline period, ranging from +36.1 bps to the current -56.9 bps.

Why it matters

Persistent negative premiums and declining liquidity signal potential market-making stress or demand imbalance that could impair the token's utility as a price-efficient equity proxy.

Key observations

HOODx trades at -56.9bps versus the HOOD reference price.

premium_bps = -56.9 bps (baseline -22.44)

Circulating supply is 597,392.604 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).

supply_ui_amount = 597,392.604 tokens (baseline 597,392.604)

Tracked DEX liquidity totals $341,329 across ? pools.

liquidity_usd = 341,329 USD (baseline 353,108)

The five largest token accounts hold 94% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).

top5_account_share = 0.94 ratio (baseline 0.94)

24h DEX volume of $98,126 implies 0.29x turnover of pooled liquidity.

volume_24h_usd = 98,126 USD

Thesis

The widening discount reflects deteriorating market conditions for the tokenized equity wrapper, with liquidity contraction amplifying price dislocation from the underlying reference asset.

Claims

  • Factconfidence 99%

    HOODx trades at a -56.9 basis point discount to the HOOD reference price of $98.3187, with the token priced at $97.7593.

    Would falsify this: reference_price_usd updates to differ from $98.3187 premium_bps recalculation yields different value

  • Calculationconfidence 95%

    The current premium of -56.9 bps represents the widest discount observed across the 11.7-hour baseline period.

    Would falsify this: baseline contains unobserved premium below -56.895261618906055 bps timestamp misalignment invalidates baseline span

  • Calculationconfidence 90%

    Liquidity has declined 3.7% from $354,712 to $341,329 over the past 30 minutes.

    Would falsify this: prior liquidity_usd reading of 354712.33785565547 is erroneous current liquidity_usd measurement includes stale pool data

  • Factconfidence 98%

    The top 5 holders control 94.01% of circulating supply, indicating extreme concentration risk.

    Would falsify this: top5_holder_share recalculation yields different value holder identification methodology changes

  • Calculationconfidence 92%

    24-hour volume of $98,126 against $341,329 in liquidity implies 0.29x turnover, suggesting limited trading activity relative to pool depth.

    Would falsify this: volume_24h_usd includes wash trading liquidity_usd is overstated due to double-counting

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The premium has exhibited high volatility across the baseline, ranging from +36.1 bps to -56.9 bps, suggesting unstable arbitrage conditions.

    Would falsify this: baseline volatility is normal for the asset class observed range reflects data quality issues rather than genuine market movement

  • Factconfidence 99%

    The supply of 597,392.604 tokens has remained unchanged across all 24 baseline observations, indicating no minting or burning activity.

    Would falsify this: supply_ui_amount changes in subsequent observations token contract permits unobserved supply adjustments

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The contraction in liquidity concurrent with widening discount suggests market maker withdrawal or reduced arbitrage capital deployment.

    Would falsify this: liquidity decline is due to routine rebalancing rather than market maker exit discount widening is driven by reference price lag rather than token selling pressure

Evidence ledger

4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.

Methodology

Methods

  • Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
  • Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
  • Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
  • Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines

Exclusions and transformations

  • UTC clock normalization
  • Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
  • Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed

Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset

Confidence rationale

Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.62 (moderate).

Limitations

  • DEX price data unavailable due to DexScreener API rate limiting, preventing cross-validation of Jupiter-sourced metrics.
  • Transaction count metrics (txns_h1, txns_24h) are null in current observation, limiting activity analysis.
  • Pool count and pair count metrics unavailable, obscuring liquidity fragmentation assessment.
  • Baseline liquidity data has gaps (null values) from DexScreener-sourced snapshots, reducing confidence in trend analysis.
  • Single-source dependency on Jupiter for current liquidity and volume creates concentration risk in data integrity.
  • Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
  • Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/XsvNBAYkrDRNhA7wPHQfX3ZUXZyZLdnCQDfHZ56bzpg.

Related research

This object elsewhere

sha256:a40987ce7ea609f72624438ab6d97b8011bd51dbf46c4a5b242c5856e0f5106e

This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.

Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.