CRCLx trades +68.3bps above the CRCL reference price
Token price diverges 68.3bps from the reference equity price.
Summary
CRCLx trades at +68.3bps versus the CRCL reference price. Circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation). Tracked DEX liquidity totals $5,018,779 across 23 pools. The five largest token accounts hold 54.5% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included). 24h DEX volume of $115,745 implies 0.02x turnover of pooled liquidity.
Why it matters
Tokenized equities trade continuously while their reference markets do not. Divergence, liquidity, and activity shifts quantify what that continuous access costs or earns.
Key observations
CRCLx trades at +68.3bps versus the CRCL reference price.
premium_bps = 68.3 bps (baseline 39.701)
Circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).
supply_ui_amount = 821,079.766 tokens (baseline 821,079.766)
Tracked DEX liquidity totals $5,018,779 across 23 pools.
liquidity_usd = 5,018,779 USD (baseline 5,013,521)
The five largest token accounts hold 54.5% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).
top5_account_share = 0.545 ratio (baseline 0.545)
24h DEX volume of $115,745 implies 0.02x turnover of pooled liquidity.
volume_24h_usd = 115,745 USD
Thesis
The leading signal this cycle is premium divergence (Token price diverges 68.3bps from the reference equity price.) The measurements below are source-verified; interpretation is limited to what the evidence supports.
Claims
- Factconfidence 95%
CRCLx circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens, verified against Solana RPC.
- Calculationconfidence 90%
CRCLx trades at +68.3bps versus the CRCL reference price ($71.48522720170426 vs $71).
- Factconfidence 88%
Tracked DEX liquidity is $5,018,779 with $115,745 of 24h volume across 23 pools.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The positive premium is consistent with net token demand while reference-market arbitrage is constrained; it should compress when primary-market redemption is active.
Would falsify this: The gap persisting through active primary-market sessions would contradict the arbitrage-constraint reading.
Evidence ledger
4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.
- onchainreliability: primary
CRCLx token supply at slot 439571136(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:fd8624e6f60721e22f49a6565533cde5da7d5488ccc48d9b022590330a28f755
- onchainreliability: primary
CRCLx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:3808662c657c6a6aadffe9c19c754f0f18b07fa2b65bacdc1714fdead5d5d9ec
- marketreliability: high
CRCLx DEX pools, liquidity, and volume(DexScreener aggregated venue data)
sha256:da91bbb46e09d5ae3233bb934cc574130b8391a99c55c8cb55e99dcf28786115
- marketreliability: high
CRCLx token price and CRCL reference price(Jupiter price service)
sha256:fcad48c4457448cec1f6cf8a3912c1b877eadae5dfb64431b31b82358393c531
Methodology
Methods
- Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
- Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
- Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
- Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines
Exclusions and transformations
- UTC clock normalization
- Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
- Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed
Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset
Confidence rationale
Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.88 (high).
Limitations
- This object was synthesized by deterministic templates from verified metrics, not a language model.
- Reference prices republished by the price service may lag the primary market.
- Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
Related research
This object elsewhere
sha256:6e26fa755bee9eb0833ef7559b0faadbb0e81b022f4e8958e5ae751d36d58ab2
This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.
Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.