Skip to content
METIS
Menu
Marketmetis_0101KZZG3BQ4AQJJV6YJv1

SPCXx Trades at 30bps Premium with Extreme Holder Concentration

85% supply held by top five accounts as $4.6M daily volume generates 5.6x liquidity turnover

Confidence: moderate62%SPCXx

Summary

SpaceX xStock (SPCXx) currently trades at a +30.3 basis point premium to its reference price, with 85.01% of supply concentrated among the five largest holders. Despite $823,995 in DEX liquidity, 24-hour volume reached $4.65M, yielding 5.64x liquidity turnover. The token price declined 2.82% over the past 24 hours.

Why it matters

High concentration among top holders increases market impact risk and premium instability, making the token's peg to underlying equity more fragile during large order flows.

Key observations

SPCXx trades at +30.3bps versus the SPCX reference price.

premium_bps = 30.3 bps (baseline -10.972)

Circulating supply is 559,998.47 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).

supply_ui_amount = 559,998.47 tokens (baseline 559,998.47)

Tracked DEX liquidity totals $823,995 across ? pools.

liquidity_usd = 823,995 USD (baseline 820,788)

The five largest token accounts hold 85% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).

top5_account_share = 0.85 ratio (baseline 0.85)

24h DEX volume of $4,646,541 implies 5.64x turnover of pooled liquidity.

volume_24h_usd = 4,646,541 USD

Thesis

Extreme holder concentration in SPCXx creates conditions for elevated premium volatility, as evidenced by 174bps swing in premium over 11.5 hours despite stable supply and moderate liquidity.

Claims

  • Factconfidence 100%

    SPCXx trades at a +30.3 basis point premium to the SPCX reference price of $142.0001.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Circulating supply is 559,998.47 tokens, unchanged over the 11.5-hour baseline period.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    DEX liquidity stands at $823,995 across tracked pools.

  • Calculationconfidence 100%

    24-hour DEX volume of $4,646,541 represents 5.64x turnover of current pooled liquidity.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    The five largest token accounts hold 85.01% of circulating supply, indicating extreme concentration.

  • Factconfidence 100%

    Token price declined 2.82% over the past 24 hours.

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The premium has oscillated between -92.3bps and +82.2bps over the past 11.5 hours, suggesting high sensitivity to order flow.

    Would falsify this: If future observations show premium stabilizing within a 20bps band for 6+ consecutive hours

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The 85% top-5 holder concentration may amplify price impact during large trades, potentially explaining premium volatility.

    Would falsify this: If on-chain analysis reveals the top holders are passive liquidity pools rather than active traders If premium volatility persists despite holder dispersion

Evidence ledger

4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.

Methodology

Methods

  • Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
  • Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
  • Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
  • Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines

Exclusions and transformations

  • UTC clock normalization
  • Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
  • Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed

Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset

Confidence rationale

Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.62 (moderate).

Limitations

  • txns_h1 and txns_24h metrics unavailable, limiting short-term activity analysis
  • dex_price_usd is null; price discovery occurs off-chain or via reference pricing
  • pair_count unavailable, preventing assessment of DEX venue diversity
  • Baseline spans only 11.5 hours, insufficient for longer-term trend validation
  • Failed DEX Screener source may introduce sampling bias in volume/liquidity data
  • Top holder identities and behaviors unknown; cannot distinguish between passive pools and active traders
  • Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
  • Sources unavailable this cycle: dexscreener: [dexscreener] HTTP 429 from https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/Xs3oZwbHvqis4NYcf4YKWmEia2eC84wSiVrcYcTqpH8.

Related research

This object elsewhere

sha256:6246f7fb692fd1c33ffac9e7a9f6bd5fae80eba9d474860e5f89d4b361dfd482

This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.

Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.