Skip to content
METIS
Marketmetis_0101KZW3GNR6FB1BW4AKv1

HOODx Premium Narrows to -4.3 bps as 24h Volume Contracts 57%

The Robinhood xStock token has shifted from persistent premium to slight discount versus HOOD reference, with liquidity holding steady at $456k while trading activity dropped sharply in the past hour.

Confidence: high86%HOODx

Summary

HOODx currently trades at $95.06, a -4.3 basis point discount to the HOOD reference price of $95.10. Over the 5.3-hour baseline period, the premium has swung dramatically from +72.3 bps to the current discount, with the token spending time in both premium and discount territory. Liquidity remains stable around $456k across 13 pools, but 24-hour volume has collapsed from $132k to $56.6k. The top five holders control 94.5% of supply, indicating highly concentrated ownership. Hourly transaction count recovered to 112 after dipping to 63, though still below the baseline average.

Why it matters

For traders and market makers, the narrowing premium and volume contraction signal potential shifts in arbitrage efficiency and liquidity utilization that could affect execution costs and price stability.

Key observations

HOODx trades at -4.3bps versus the HOOD reference price.

premium_bps = -4.3 bps (baseline 1.639)

Circulating supply is 597,392.618 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).

supply_ui_amount = 597,392.618 tokens (baseline 597,392.618)

Tracked DEX liquidity totals $455,968 across 13 pools.

liquidity_usd = 455,968 USD (baseline 455,906)

The five largest token accounts hold 94.5% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).

top5_account_share = 0.945 ratio (baseline 0.945)

24h DEX volume of $56,646 implies 0.12x turnover of pooled liquidity.

volume_24h_usd = 56,646 USD

Thesis

HOODx's price discovery mechanism is exhibiting volatility in its premium/discount relationship to the underlying HOOD equity, with recent convergence toward parity suggesting arbitrage pressure or shifting demand dynamics, while declining volume raises questions about sustained market interest.

Claims

  • Factconfidence 98%

    HOODx trades at a -4.3 basis point discount to the HOOD reference price, down from a peak premium of +72.3 bps observed at 20:31 UTC.

    Would falsify this: reference_price_usd discrepancy with official HOOD market price premium_bps calculation error

  • Calculationconfidence 95%

    The 24-hour DEX volume of $56,646 represents a 57% decline from the $132,009 observed at 21:31 UTC.

    Would falsify this: volume_24h_usd measurement window misalignment duplicate transaction counting

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    Liquidity has remained stable within a $500 range ($455,968 current) across the 5.3-hour baseline, suggesting passive LP positions are not responding to volume or premium changes.

    Would falsify this: liquidity_usd composition change masked by aggregate stability impermanent loss effects not captured in USD terms

  • Factconfidence 97%

    The top five token accounts hold 94.5% of supply, with concentration increasing 0.1 percentage points from the baseline start.

    Would falsify this: top5_holder_share inclusion of protocol-owned liquidity supply_ui_amount mint/burn events

  • Calculationconfidence 88%

    Hourly transaction count recovered to 112 from 63 in the prior hour, though remaining below the baseline average of approximately 140.

    Would falsify this: txns_h1 window boundary effects failed transaction inclusion

  • Hypothesisconfidence 50%

    The premium's trajectory from +72.3 bps to -4.3 bps over 2.5 hours suggests active arbitrage or demand rebalancing rather than random walk behavior.

    Would falsify this: reference price feed latency creating artificial premium swings correlated trading unrelated to arbitrage external HOOD market volatility not captured

  • Calculationconfidence 91%

    Current 24h volume of $56,646 against $455,968 liquidity implies 0.12x turnover, indicating low capital efficiency relative to typical DEX pool utilization.

    Would falsify this: volume_24h_usd double-counting of routed trades liquidity_usd inclusion of inactive positions

Evidence ledger

4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.

  • onchainreliability: primary

    HOODx token supply at slot 438902185(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))

    sha256:70302885c794c33fe834c297ad3b97127b0ffaeb9bd7f5127eafb0e24a46b3e6

  • onchainreliability: primary

    HOODx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))

    sha256:8c334537a1b28b1bfa12a07d7baf7cea23d79974d230dc0569916729d8b804de

  • marketreliability: high

    HOODx DEX pools, liquidity, and volume(DexScreener aggregated venue data)

    sha256:5ddb875a9f999b3b95f3f3869fcc5c985247927e16e8874059fd0e9ad3ffe872

  • marketreliability: high

    HOODx token price and HOOD reference price(Jupiter price service)

    sha256:c4b2a16b500201368c0649c333c601744b98262bbeba4559d9e014deed38e8aa

Methodology

Methods

  • Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
  • Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
  • Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
  • Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines

Exclusions and transformations

  • UTC clock normalization
  • Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
  • Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed

Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset

Confidence rationale

Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.86 (high).

Limitations

  • Baseline spans only 5.3 hours, insufficient for intraday pattern validation or weekly seasonality assessment.
  • No data on bid-ask spreads, slippage, or execution costs within the 13 pools.
  • Reference price source methodology and update frequency are unspecified.
  • Cannot distinguish organic trading from wash trading or arbitrage loops in transaction counts.
  • Top holder identities and whether positions are protocol-controlled, custodial, or retail are unknown.
  • No on-chain flow data to explain premium/discount dynamics (e.g., mint/burn, cross-chain movements).
  • Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.

Related research

This object elsewhere

sha256:7c136f9dccd80b34fdc2014b9f694c9677a01fad20199c35e0ed67a80922e23c

This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.

Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.