CRCLx trades +80.8bps above the CRCL reference price
Token price diverges 80.8bps from the reference equity price.
Summary
CRCLx trades at +80.8bps versus the CRCL reference price. Circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation). Tracked DEX liquidity totals $5,024,860 across 22 pools. The five largest token accounts hold 54.5% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included). 24h DEX volume of $120,326 implies 0.02x turnover of pooled liquidity.
Why it matters
Tokenized equities trade continuously while their reference markets do not. Divergence, liquidity, and activity shifts quantify what that continuous access costs or earns.
Key observations
CRCLx trades at +80.8bps versus the CRCL reference price.
premium_bps = 80.8 bps (baseline 49.594)
Circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens (+0% vs the prior observation).
supply_ui_amount = 821,079.766 tokens (baseline 821,079.766)
Tracked DEX liquidity totals $5,024,860 across 22 pools.
liquidity_usd = 5,024,860 USD (baseline 5,016,858)
The five largest token accounts hold 54.5% of supply (pools and custodial accounts included).
top5_account_share = 0.545 ratio (baseline 0.545)
24h DEX volume of $120,326 implies 0.02x turnover of pooled liquidity.
volume_24h_usd = 120,326 USD
Thesis
The leading signal this cycle is premium divergence (Token price diverges 80.8bps from the reference equity price.) The measurements below are source-verified; interpretation is limited to what the evidence supports.
Claims
- Factconfidence 95%
CRCLx circulating supply is 821,079.766 tokens, verified against Solana RPC.
- Calculationconfidence 90%
CRCLx trades at +80.8bps versus the CRCL reference price ($71.57380110257326 vs $71).
- Factconfidence 88%
Tracked DEX liquidity is $5,024,860 with $120,326 of 24h volume across 22 pools.
- Hypothesisconfidence 50%
The positive premium is consistent with net token demand while reference-market arbitrage is constrained; it should compress when primary-market redemption is active.
Would falsify this: The gap persisting through active primary-market sessions would contradict the arbitrage-constraint reading.
Evidence ledger
4 sources, each with retrieval time and, where applicable, a snapshot hash.
- onchainreliability: primary
CRCLx token supply at slot 439601347(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:d4bc12aeb443f91c5ab92005655ffb64d5e07fa9ba4cf7c01e5d344020742182
- onchainreliability: primary
CRCLx largest token accounts(Solana mainnet (direct RPC))
sha256:f32dae08a171dbed65a0039509617af4bdf7a61316fb3b3e183750be51ea9c5c
- marketreliability: high
CRCLx DEX pools, liquidity, and volume(DexScreener aggregated venue data)
sha256:8cf6e5d6bb2a91817ff3a1961affb1cf617f0240b02a12e3469ff978a1785984
- marketreliability: high
CRCLx token price and CRCL reference price(Jupiter price service)
sha256:f911270c700973a6e944e6e124af2b9cccba9e3b30021d456cc0b639a8368806
Methodology
Methods
- Direct Solana RPC verification of token supply and largest accounts
- Cross-venue aggregation of DEX pools, liquidity, and volume
- Token-versus-reference price comparison from an independent price service
- Deterministic anomaly detection against stored observation baselines
Exclusions and transformations
- UTC clock normalization
- Raw payload hashing for every source fetch
- Sources that failed during collection are recorded, not imputed
Comparison window: Stored observation history for this asset
Confidence rationale
Confidence is computed from source coverage, cross-venue agreement, baseline depth, and independent verification. This run scored 0.88 (high).
Limitations
- This object was synthesized by deterministic templates from verified metrics, not a language model.
- Reference prices republished by the price service may lag the primary market.
- Largest-account concentration includes liquidity pools and custodial accounts; it is not a beneficial-owner distribution.
Related research
This object elsewhere
sha256:1eb7f9f1165606ed3e5761edf50885d688271f25a36f66b3d178f54a7f913d63
This is informational research produced by an automated system. It may contain errors, omissions, or delayed data.
Nothing here is individualized financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.